Israel-Palestine have the same land rights as both have been living in that land since thousands of years probably, they both belong to there, so, in that case, both have the same lands as homeland, and there can be even homelands inside other homelands, for example, something that I forgot to mention was the indigenous people in North America, and precisely also Israel and Palestine (sorry for that, ADHD), in the case of Mexico (because it is the best one for me to tell an example of this), there are many ethnical indigenous groups original from here, some of those don't identify themselves as Mexicans because they don't identify with that same culture, and they have authonomy over their own communities due to a proposal by Emiliano Zapata during Mexican Revolution, so they consider their own town as their homeland, then Mexicans consider Mexico as their homeland, so that makes a homeland be inside another homeland, in the case of Palestine and Israel this is what happens, but Jewish identity is more religious because they have been expulsed from many countries, they united again as a people due to their religion,that after centuries of not having a homeland, and the Israel-Palestine conflict is not a conflict about homeland, it is religious, each government has much influence from their own religion and claim that land as only theirs, so, they need to make that land a shared homeland, and with a neutral and laic government that cares for both nations' peoples and respects both religions also promoting peace and respect between both. And non-Arab Palestinians already lived there since the same time as Jews.
I didn't mention China or the border conflicts because they are part of other terms not related to these kinds of homeland, I am still working on redacting about those problems and those other terms, but when I do, it might get a little materialist, but I can say that those are not stuff related to homelands, that stuff is related to countries, nations and projects of nations, and those are the terms that I'm developing, but I'll tell you 1 example of each one: The countries on map are countries, in that work I'll explain them; things like the lands lost by Mexico, or the German speaking territories in Europe where there was a desire of union between all of them during 19th century are nations, and things like Hitler's Lebensraum were projects of nation, and it is specially the projects of nation the main cause of border conflicts, for example, the plan to get the German Lebensraum led to Germany starting World War 2, I'd probably consider the Chinese conflicts with India as a project of nation, as well as Taiwan and the dominion over the South China Sea, but the sea is not a homeland, a sea cannot be considered as part of a homeland, the territorial seas are part of a country, but not of a homeland, homelands and nations are more a thing related to communities and individuals, meanwhile countries and projects of nation are more a materialist thing and are related to the material possesions, Africa has its own land conflicts, European countries had their projects of nation during colonization of Africa, and that split up different homelands and now they're claiming them back, and then the countries get conflicts for lands, but those conflicts in Africa are because projects of nation of Europeans. Independence of countries is because they get a different homeland identity and then they create a new project of nation for themselves that includes independence and in some cases apart of independence they also propose more stuff after gaining independence.
